Current process map
A map showing who is involved, what information they use, what they decide and how work passes between them, including where it gets held up.
A clear first step / $300 USD
If a report, handoff or approval keeps getting stuck, we look at how it works. We map one process, find what gets in the way and recommend a practical next step. The review can cover Microsoft tools, Zapier, Make, n8n or a mix of apps. We can also check whether an AI step would help.
Work directly with Felipe Quintana. Start with a brief description and a free 20-minute call to see if I can help.
The starting point
What you receive
The review gives you a written plan. You can use it whether or not you hire me to build anything afterward.
A map showing who is involved, what information they use, what they decide and how work passes between them, including where it gets held up.
A written summary of data quality, who is responsible, who has access and which tools the process needs, focusing on what matters next.
Options in order of priority, such as clearer field definitions, a simpler manual process, a reporting workflow or a small app.
An outline of the recommended work and an estimate of the effort, with assumptions and unanswered questions listed.
What is included: The $300 review covers one process, the working session and written recommendations. Building the solution, detailed design, moving data and ongoing support must be agreed separately.
How we work
Use the project brief to describe the process, owner and desired result. A free 20-minute call checks whether the review is the right start.
In the 60-minute working session, walk through a recent example, the people involved and what happens when something is missing or late.
Receive the process map, a summary of the limits and a written recommendation. Any follow-on work is agreed separately once we know what it includes.
Sample written review / Entirely made-up data
Process: a small studio copies new requests from its inbox into a task list. This invented sample has five requests: one without an owner, two unfinished requests past their due date and one repeated arrival of the same request.
Finding: the team needs a shared request ID and a clear owner before adding automatic reminders. Otherwise a repeated message can create another task, and a reminder still has nobody to act on it.
Recommendation: keep one request register, require an owner or a visible review state, and agree the overdue rule. Then assess one connection from intake to the task list.
Before estimating the build: confirm that the source supplies a stable request ID, the task tool supports the required actions and someone owns failed runs. The written estimate would state those assumptions and any open questions.
Describe one process for a review
This is a sample of the review format, not a client engagement, completed automation or measured result. The $300 review includes written recommendations. Implementation is separate.
Before we start
No. The free 20-minute fit call checks the problem, owner and scope. The $300 review includes a separate 60-minute working session and the written deliverables listed above.
That can be the right result. Clearer field definitions, someone taking responsibility or one shared source may help more. The recommendation depends on the process and its limits.
This offer covers one process. If the problem involves several workflows, we choose one useful part to start with or propose a wider review.
Start with a description or redacted sample. Any later access or transfer of sensitive material is agreed with the appropriate owner before it happens.
The review includes analysis and written recommendations. Building the solution is planned and priced separately. You do not have to buy a follow-on project.
Choose your next step
Tell Felipe what happens now, who owns it and where it gets difficult. A short description is enough to start.
Prefer email? felipe@getquintera.com
No payment or commitment on this page.